Briefs

Private Label Coffee Company Wins Keurig Patent Suit

May 29, 2013

The Rogers Family Company, which makes private label single-serve coffee for Safeway among other business, announced Wednesday that it had won a patent lawsuit filed by Keurig over Rogers’ OneCup product.

The case involved three Keurig patents. The Rogers Family Company launched its OneCup line, under its San Francisco Bay brand, in the fall of 2011 and began selling it in Safeway stores in mid-2012, before Keurig’s patents were set to expire that fall.

“I am pleased to announce that the U.S. District Court in Boston ruled that the Rogers Family Company’s OneCup products do not infringe any of the Keurig patents,” Rogers Family Company President Jon B. Rogers said in a news release. “This is a great victory for the Rogers family and our customers.  There is no longer any doubt about our ability to sell our OneCup products for use in Keurig brewers.”

The Rogers Family Company argued that its OneCup product was unique, breakthrough technology produced after years of research and study.

For the design patent, the court compared the Rogers design with the Keurig design. The court first addressed whether certain features of the cartridge were functional or ornamental, finding that the circular lid of both designs was ornamental, as was the depending skirt, or ring to which the filter is attached. 

The “general tapered shape” of the filter affects the quality of the beverage cartridge, so it is a functional feature.  The specific type of tapered filter shape was ornamental. 

The court then found that the overall appearance of the Rogers cartridge was plainly dissimilar to the Keurig design, and a consumer would note that the one was substantially similar to the other, the release stated.

For the two utility patents, the court first addressed the apparatus claim, finding that Keurig’s rights under the asserted claim were exhausted once it sells the brewer, because it indisputably sells, or licenses others to sell, both the brewer and the filter cartridge.

The court then addressed the method claim. Relying on a Delaware court’s decision in the Sturm case, the court found that the Keurig brewers were sold as completed products and that the “substantial embodiment” test did not apply. The court also found that because Keurig’s rights in the brewers were exhausted once they were sold, customers had the right to buy replacement cartridges from whatever source they choose, the release stated.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Private Label Buyer.

Recent Articles by Chris Freeman

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

April 2014 New Non-Food Products

This month's new non-food products include sunscreen bands, makeup remover, lip balm, jumbo cotton balls, healing ointment, and a shelf-management system for better merchandising.

Podcasts

Coming with a clear, comprehensive plan was the key to success for Longo Brothers Fruit Markets when the grocer decided to roll out a two-tier private label strategy, Jenny Longo and Robert Koss tell PLBuyer editor Chris Freeman in this podcast.

More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Private Label Buyer Magazine

PLB April 2014 cover

April 2014

The April 2014 issue of Private Label Buyer includes articles on Omnichannel, store brand sauces, and more. Check it out today!

Table Of Contents Subscribe

NBB Private Label Foods

Which factors will drive further awareness—and development—of national-brand-better (NBB) private label foods?
View Results Poll Archive

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

plbuyer superstore logo

STAY CONNECTED

facebook_40px twitter_40px  youtube_40pxlinkedin_40px