Hot Shots
by Denise Leathers
May 20, 2010
Cash-strapped consumers sought out less-expensive store brand alternatives in every aisle of the supermarket the past year, driving double-digit gains in 126 private label categories.
Made up of
food and beverage categories that saw dollar sales across food, drug and mass
merchandise outlets (excluding Walmart) expand 10 percent or more during the 52
weeks ending Jan. 24, the 2010 Private Label Hot List actually includes fewer
categories than last year’s version (126 vs. 146). This marks the first time in
recent memory the list actually contracted from year to year — despite the fact
that private label unit share across outlets hit an all-time-high of 23
percent. What happened?
Through much of 2008 and early 2009,
food prices were rising faster than they had in decades, landing a record
number of categories with inflated dollar sales on 2009’s Hot List, reports Sue
Viamari, editor of Chicago-based SymphonyIRI Group Inc.’s Times &
Trends newsletter.
“When total CPG prices rose,
private label rose even more sharply. Particularly during periods of
inflation,” she explains, “private label has an advantage. ... Retailers can
afford to raise prices yet still offer consumers savings vs. national brands,”
helping them close price gaps that had become too wide, boost margins and still
win share points.
During the
last quarter of 2009, however, the United States entered a deflationary period
that saw store brand prices fall even faster than overall prices. Retailers
used their private labels to position themselves as low-cost leaders, negating
some of the gains posted by store brands earlier in the year. In fact, 20
percent of the categories on this year’s Hot List actually saw a reduction in
average price per unit from 2008 to 2009.
But
according to Viamari, fourth-quarter deflation does not deserve all the blame
for a smaller-than-expected 2010 Hot List. Many Americans simply are getting by
with less.
“Consumers
have adopted very conservative shopping and consumption patterns over the
course of the recession,” she explains. “In general, consumers are trying to
make products last longer and are more selective about what is ‘necessary’ vs.
‘nice to have.’”
In fact, the February 2010 issue of Times &
Trends revealed that total consumer packaged good (CPG) unit sales decreased
1.9 percent from 2008 to 2009, although dollar sales edged up 0.4 percent as a
result of price inflation. So while store brand sales did increase from 2008 to
2009, across-the-board cuts in spending kept private label growth in check.
Recession Helps Fuel Growth
Although
the 2010 Hot List is a little smaller than last year’s compilation, 126 private
label categories with double-digit gains still represent a noteworthy
achievement. Clearly, says Jon Hauptman, a partner with Barrington, Ill.-based
Willard Bishop, the poor economy spurred some of the store brand holdouts to
finally give private label a try.
“Many
shoppers found these products to be appealing, cost-saving alternatives to
national brands,” Hauptman explains, adding that he expects “smart shopping”
strategies to stick post-recession, suggesting a bright future for store brands
as well.
But
Hauptman gives some of the credit for private label’s performance over the past
year to the emergence of second- or economy-tier private label programs, which
enjoyed some of the strongest store brand gains over the past year or so.
Not only do
such products allow customers to maximize their grocery spend, “They’re a great
defense against extreme-value formats such as supercenters, limited-assortment
stores and dollar stores,” he explains. “Retailers are finding that expanding
their assortments of economy private label is a great way to enhance price
image without lowering prices.”
Other
factors behind private label’s success over the past year are the expansion of
store brand assortments and SKU rationalization, which combined to give private
label a bigger piece of the grocery pie.
“While SKU
rationalization activities at many retailers started on the non-foods side of
the store, these activities [have started to extend] to the rest of the store,”
Hauptman reports. “Overall, I think SKU rationalization will have a positive
impact on private label,” he adds. “It will force retailers to eliminate
slower-moving, undifferentiated brands and SKUs, thereby providing more space
for top brands and private label. ‘De-cluttering’ the shelf via SKU rationalization
will also help shoppers find private label options more easily.”
But
retailers must be careful not to overdo it. Yes, shoppers want a simpler,
streamlined shopping experience, Viamari says.
“At the
same time, though, consumers are looking for selection,” she says. “So it’s a
delicate balance.”
The impact
of SKU rationalization on private label sales is best reflected by those 2010
Hot List categories that saw the biggest increases in dollar share from year to
year, including single-serve prepared salads (+10.7 share points), frozen
cheesecakes (+8.0 points), ice pop novelties (+6.7 points), nutritional
snacks/trail mixes (+5.9 points), refrigerated side dishes (+5.5 points),
refrigerated pizza/pizza kits (+5.3 points), canned meat/meat spreads (+5.1
points), natural string cheese (+4.1 points), frozen raw shrimp (+4.0 points)
and shelf-stable bottled “other” fruit juice (+3.8 points).
Interestingly, three of the 10 categories with
the highest share gains also landed on the list of categories in which average
price per unit increased the most from year to year, including canned meat/meat
spreads (+25.2 percent), baked beans (+18.8 percent), canned salmon (+18.6
percent), ready-to-serve broth (+17.4 percent), frozen cheesecakes (+16.9 percent),
baby food/snacks (+16.7 percent), frozen side dishes (+16.2 percent), “all
other” beans (+13.9 percent), single-serve prepared salads (+12.4 percent) and
canned/bottled green beans (+11.3 percent). Although the 2010 Hot List does not
reflect price increases on the national brand side, private label prices often
rise and fall along with their national brand counterparts, suggesting that
some consumers might have made the switch to store brands when they saw branded
prices rise above an acceptable level.
Growth in High- and Low-Share Categories
Although
strong dollar sales gains in categories in which store brand shares are
relatively low to start with are no surprise, the 2010 Hot List includes only
36 categories with single-digit dollar shares. But the appearance of categories
such as canned and bottled tea (2.8 percent), baby food/snacks (2.2 percent),
barbecue sauce (8.4 percent), potato chips (7.2 percent), single-serve frozen
dinners/entrees (2.2 percent), low-calorie soft drinks (3.5 percent) and novelty
non-chocolate candy (5.1 percent) on this year’s list is significant because
many of these highly differentiated, heavily marketed national-brand-dominated
segments once were thought largely closed to store brands.
According
to Doron Levy, president of Toronto-based Captus Business Consulting, consumers
still reeling from the effects of the recession really focused on value last
year — so much so, they were willing to switch to store brands in categories
that normally are dominated by national or regional brands.
In
fact, a February 2010 survey by GfK Custom Research North America for the New
York-based Private Label Manufacturers Association reveals that 43 percent of shoppers reported
passing up a familiar national brand in favor of a private label alternative in
a category in which they usually opted for the former, up from 35 percent in
June 2009. But retailers are doing their part to help consumers make that
choice.
“Because
of tightening margins, major chains are realizing the benefit of an expanded
house brand selection,” Levy explains.
He
calls private label’s movement into less-obvious categories a matter of
survival.
Despite
gains by private label categories with low shares, a whopping 45 entries on
this year’s Hot List boast dollar shares in excess of 20 percent — well above
private label’s 17.7 percent average across categories. Leading the pack are
refrigerated cakes-no snack/coffee cakes (80.3 percent), canned/bottled carrots
(63.5 percent), white granulated sugar (59.9 percent), shelf-stable honey (54.2
percent), single-serve prepared salads (53.5 percent), frozen raw shrimp (52.8
percent), coconut (50.2 percent), refrigerated prepared salad/fruit/coleslaw
(48.2 percent), nutritional snacks/trail mixes (47.1 percent) and
brown/powdered/flavored sugar (46.7 percent).
“In
some of these categories, only private label is offered [in certain stores],”
Levy says. “So to some degree, SKU rationalization helped drive growth in the
house brand.”
But retailers don’t deserve all the credit for
those categories’ strong performance over the past year. According to Viamari,
consumers new to private label generally start by purchasing
low-differentiation, commodity-type products (sugar, vinegar, kernel popcorn,
etc.) for which store brand quality already is well-established. This practice
boosts sales in low-risk categories, where shares are high to begin with. Then,
as they become more comfortable, consumers branch out into other, more
differentiated private label products.
Consumer Trends Play a Key Role
Although
pricing and share certainly played a role in determining which categories made
this year’s Hot List, many of the entries reflect changes in consumer buying
habits. For example, consumers forced to cut back on meals prepared away from
home are dining in much more frequently. But they are just as busy and “cooking
challenged” as ever, creating increased demand for quick, easy-to-prepare fare,
especially on the frozen side. In fact, a recent article in The Wall Street
Journal said frozen food sales over the past year expanded more than four times
the rate of total food sales, as retailers added better-quality options to
their frozen food assortments.
As a
result, SymphonyIRI reports, private label added almost a whole point to its
share of frozen food unit sales across outlets (20.4 percent), thanks to strong
gains in categories such as frozen side dishes, frozen breakfast entrees,
frozen fish/seafood, frozen pizza, frozen plain potatoes/fries/hash browns and
frozen fresh-baked bread/roll/biscuits.
Similar
advances were posted by convenience-oriented refrigerated categories
(refrigerated pizza/pizza kits, refrigerated appetizers/snack rolls,
refrigerated side dishes, refrigerated pasta/noodles, fresh-cut salad,
refrigerated sauce/gravy/marinade mixes, refrigerated prepared
salad/fruit/coleslaw, etc.), which also benefited from a perception among
consumers that they are “fresher” and/or closer to homemade than their frozen
counterparts. In fact, SymphonyIRI says, the fresh/perishable department was
the only one that actually posted a unit sales gain (+0.9 percent) over the
past year, although dollar sales dipped 3.6 percent as a result of deflation.
And private label added more than one point to its unit share of the
department, which now stands at 34.2 percent, although its dollar share fell
more than half a point to 31.1 percent.
Consumers looking to
stretch their food budgets even further adopted more of a back-to-basics
approach over the course of the recession, eschewing convenience products in
favor of from-scratch cooking, which boosted sales of staple ingredients such
as ready-to-serve broth, bouillon, tomato paste, ketchup, dry meat/seafood
seasoning mixes, dry soup, mayonnaise/sandwich spread, liquid gravy,
spices/seasonings and bread crumbs, among others. In fact, SymphonyIRI reports,
private label’s share of center-store unit sales edged up almost half a point
to 20.6 percent.
The
from-scratch trend also was evidenced by the large number of common baking
ingredients on this year’s Hot List, including ready-to-use pie crust,
chips/baking chocolate/cocoa, brown/powdered/flavored sugar, pie/pastry
filling, cooking/baking nuts, white granulated sugar, frosting/frosting mixes,
refrigerated cookie/brownie dough, pudding/pie filling/mousse mixes and baking
powder/soda.
Although
more consumers are cooking and eating from home, many also are entertaining
there as well, creating a spike in sales of snack foods, desserts and other
products that Viamari says offer “indulgence that doesn’t break the bank.” Top gainers
include frozen cheesecakes, specialty nut/coconut candy, “other” salted snacks
(no nuts), frozen sweet goods – no cheesecakes, potato chips, non-chocolate
chewy candy, single-serve microwave popcorn, chocolate syrup/dessert toppings,
plain mints, tortilla/tostada chips, cookies, doughnuts, frozen ice cream/ice
milk desserts and cupcakes/brownies.
And then
there’s the whole better-for-you trend, evidenced by the appearance of
categories such as nutritional/intrinsic health value bars (this year’s top
private label gainer), sugar substitutes, sunflower/pumpkin seeds, nutritional
snacks/trail mixes, “other” dried fruit, refrigerated kefir/milk
substitutes/soy milk, rice cakes/popcorn cakes and dried plums.
“Nutrition
is now at the center of many consumers’ wellness strategies — and another way
to save money,” Viamari says. “Consumers are using food to manage conditions
from being overweight to high cholesterol and diabetes.”
The Takeaway
According
to industry experts, retailers hoping to keep the private label momentum going
can use the 2010 Hot List to identify categories in which their own-brand
efforts fall short. Special attention should be paid to high dollar-volume
categories (cookies, white granulated sugar, fresh-cut salad, refrigerated
bacon, frozen plain potatoes/fries/hash browns, frozen pizza, processed
frozen/refrigerated chicken/chicken substitutes, frozen fish/seafood,
refrigerated prepared salad/fruit/coleslaw, potato chips and frozen raw
shrimp), as well as those with the highest average price per unit (frozen ice
cream/ice milk desserts, frozen raw shrimp, frozen cheesecakes, refrigerated
cakes-no snack/coffee cakes, refrigerated appetizers/snack rolls, refrigerated
pizza/pizza kits, frozen meat (no poultry), frozen sweet goods – no cheesecake,
frozen fish/seafood and processed frozen/refrigerated chicken/chicken
substitutes).
But they
should not ignore smaller-volume categories, especially those in which store
brand share is low, leaving plenty of room for additional growth. Private label
opportunities also exist in high-share categories once thought to be saturated,
evidenced by dollar and share gains in categories such as white granulated
sugar, honey, canned/bottled corn and ice cream cones.
Whatever
the category, “Private label manufacturers and retailers really need to
continue to innovate,” Viamari says. “Marketers should be on the lookout for
new technologies in their own categories and departments, as well as across the
store. New ingredients, new packaging, etc., can be imported to allow for
relatively quick and inexpensive innovation that offers differentiation.”
Innovative
new products — combined with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s prediction
that the Consumer Price Index for food will increase 1.5 to 2.5 percent in 2010
and GfK Custom Research’s finding that more than six in 10 consumers plan to
buy more private label in the coming year — suggest a bright future for store
brands.
“The next
year will definitely be interesting to watch,” Viamari remarks. “In a handful
of categories, we are seeing a bit of tapering in private label. ... as some
consumers slowly migrate back to their ‘older, less frugal’ ways of shopping
for and consuming packaged goods. But other habits are long-standing.” PLB
|